OASIS Digital Signature Services (DSS) TC
This TC operates under the Legacy IPR Policy.
Submitted to OASIS on 28 December 2006
To: [OASIS]
From: Dimitri Andivahis, dimitri@surety.com
I discussed the IPR policy issues with Surety's legal counsel, and based on this I would like to make the following IP disclosure. It is a list of 8 United Stated Patents related to timestamping that can be found in Section 5 of IETF RFC3161.
# 5,001,752 Public/Key Date-Time Notary Facility
Filing date: October 13, 1989
Issued: March 19, 1991
Inventor: Addison M. Fischer
# 5,022,080 Electronic Notary
Filing date: April 16, 1989
Issued: June 4, 1991
Inventors: Robert T. Durst, Kevin D. Hunter
# 5,136,643 Public/Key Date-Time Notary Facility
Filing date: December 20, 1990
Issued: August 4, 1992
Inventor: Addison M. Fischer
(Note: This is a continuation of patent # 5,001,752.)
# 5,136,646 Digital Document Time-Stamping with Catenate Certificate
Filing date: August 2, 1990
Issued: August 4, 1992
Inventors: Stuart A. Haber, Wakefield S. Stornetta Jr.
(assignee) Bell Communications Research, Inc.,
# 5,136,647 Method for Secure Time-Stamping of Digital Documents Filing date: August 2, 1990
Issued: August 4, 1992
Inventors: Stuart A. Haber, Wakefield S. Stornetta Jr.
(assignee) Bell Communications Research, Inc.,
# 5,373,561 Method of Extending the Validity of a Cryptographic Certificate
Filing date: December 21, 1992
Issued: December 13, 1994
Inventors: Stuart A. Haber, Wakefield S. Stornetta Jr.
(assignee) Bell Communications Research, Inc.,
# 5,422,953 Personal Date/Time Notary Device
Filing date: May 5, 1993
Issued: June 6, 1995
Inventor: Addison M. Fischer
# 5,781,629 Digital Document Authentication System
Filing date: February 21, 1997
Issued: July 14, 1998
Inventor: Stuart A. Haber, Wakefield S. Stornetta Jr.
(assignee) Surety Technologies, Inc.,
Of the patents listed above, the ones listing Haber & Stornetta as inventors are either owned or claimed by my organization (Surety). For these patents, this disclosure is done according to Section 8.1 of the OASIS IPR policy.
For the 3rd party patents (i.e. the ones not owned nor claimed by Surety), this disclosure is done according to Section 8.2 of the OASIS IPR policy.
Submitted to OASIS on 6 May 2006
To: [OASIS]
From: John Messing, jmessing@law-on-line.com
Further to the IPR disclosure of 4 August 2003 which is posted on the DSS TC website, please be advised that the following U.S. patents have issued to me:
- Electronic signature method, US Patent No. 7,039,805
- Electronic certificate signature program No. 6,745,327
As stated in the IPR disclosure of 4 August 2003, I re-affirm that if an OASIS Standard is adopted by OASIS pursuant to the current DSS Technical Committee Charter, I will endeavor to license, for the purpose of implementing and complying with the required portions of a resulting OASIS DSS Standard, patent rights to necessary claims under reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions to be established after such patent(s) are issued and final.
As used herein, necessary claims are claims or portions of claims that are infringed because there is no technically reasonable non-infringing alternative to infringement for implementing or complying with such DSS standard.
Submitted to OASIS on 9 August 2004
To: [OASIS]
From: Edward Shallow ed.shallow@rogers.com
Here is a patent submission that was filed both internationally and in Canada. I have enclosed just one as they are the same. The TC has suggested that this patent be tabled with appropriate parties within OASIS.
[Original zip file attached to http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss/200408/msg00012.html]
Canadian Patent Application / Demande de Brevet Canadien
Filing Date / Date de depot: 2000.10.03
http://patents1.ic.gc.ca/details?patent_number=2409404&language=EN_CA
AUTOMATIC FORM ACCESSING AND SUBMISSION SYSTEM AND METHOD
SYSTEME ET PROCEDE DE DEMANDE ET D'ENVOI AUTOMATIQUES DE FORMULAIRES
Abstract: "A system for accessing, processing and transmitting data files comprising: a data network (200); a data base system (100) forming means for storing a plurality of data files (102) and being connected to the network (200); at least one local processing system (300), a notary server (400), and at least one recipient system (500), each local processing system, the notary server and each recipient system forming independent systems connected to the network (200); the notary server (400), forming means for receiving a submitted data file (102) via the network, and for transferring a submitted data file to a recipient system (500) with which the submitted data file is associated, by means of software modules for reception (410), decryption (412), and file export (416), and, wherein the notary server (400) further comprises software modules for user/sender verification (414), backup memory (418) and a time stamp module (420)."
Submitted to OASIS on 4 August 2003
To: [OASIS]
From: Juan Carlos Cruellas cruellas@ac.upc.es
The DSS TC received the following notice from Rich Salz rsalz@datapower.com on Thursday, 3 July 2003:
At a former employer I worked on a patent application which has (finally!) been published. I believe it's appropriate to mention it here.
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01& p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50& s1=%2220030093678%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20030093678&RS=DN/20030093678
"A digital signature system is provided on a server for use by remote clients, such as by using a browser. The server generates and maintains all of the users' keys used for producing a digital signature. A user sends a data object to the server, and the server generates a digital signature for the data object using the private key stored at the server. The server then sends the digital signature to the client. A client can, at a later time, send the signature back to the server for verification. Filed April 23, 2001"
Submitted to OASIS on 4 August 2003
To: [OASIS]
From: Juan Carlos Cruellas cruellas@ac.upc.es
The DSS TC received the following notice from John Messing jmessing@law-on-line.com on Sunday, 9 February 2003:
Upon reflection, I believe that I have one or more pending patent applications that may include claims related to a DSS single private key signing use case. If an OASIS Standard incorporating the court filing contribution is adopted by OASIS pursuant to the current DSS Technical Committee Charter, I will endeavor to license, for the purpose of implementing and complying with the required portions of a resulting OASIS DSS Standard, patent rights to necessary claims under reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions to be established after such patent(s) are issued and final.
As used herein, necessary claims are claims or portions of claims that are infringed because there is no technically reasonable non-infringing alternative to infringement for implementing or complying with such DSS standard.
Submitted to OASIS on 4 April 2003
To: [OASIS]
From: Robert Zuccherato, Co-Chair, DSS TC robert.zuccherato@entrust.com
The DSS TC has received the following notice regarding certain US and European patent applications (EU Ref: 03250672.7) in the name of Security & Standards Ltd.
To: [DSS TC]
From: John Ross, CEO, Security and Standards Ltd
I can confirm my company's agreement to you posting the notice in the IPR Statement section of the DSS TC.
In my capacity as CEO of Security and Standards Ltd, I can confirm that should any of the encumbered techniques be included in an OASIS DSS standard that Security and Standards Ltd would offer reasonable and non-discriminatory licenses.
Regards
John Ross
CEO
Security and Standards Ltd
192 Moulsham St
Chelmsford
Essex
England
UK
CM2 0LG
To: [DSS TC]
From: Nick Pope, Security and Standards Ltd pope@secstan.com
As I mentioned at the last DSS meeting my company has developed a system for "sealing" data which is subject to patent application. This incorpates features which relates to the choices within the DSS requirements document.
We are pleased to making available to the DSS TC a white paper on the system called GrowlTech: Seals at: http://www.secstan.co.uk/News/WhitePapers.html
Nick Pope
Security & Standards