Ballot Details: Approve SAML v2.0 Protocol Extension for Requesting Attributes per Request Version 1.0 with Non-Material Changes as a CS? (CLOSED)

Ballot Question Do you approve SAML v2.0 Protocol Extension for Requesting Attributes per Request Version 1.0 [1] with Non-Material Changes [2] as a Committee Specification?
Ballot Description This ballot requires a Special Majority Vote [3]. The TC roster currently lists 4 voting members. In order to pass, at least 3 members have to vote Yes and none may vote No.

[1] URI for the specification
Internal URI: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security/document.php?document_id=61388
Public URI: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=61388&wg_abbrev=security

[2] The Working Draft for this Committee Specification contains changes made since its last public review. The changes made are documented in https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security/download.php/61388/saml-protoc-req-attr-req-v1.0.tar.gz (public link: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/61388/saml-protoc-req-attr-req-v1.0.tar.gz). The TC judges these changes to be Non-Material Changes in accordance with the definition in the OASIS TC Process (http://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#dNonmaterialChange).

[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process-2010-07-28.php#dSpecialMajority
Ballot Options
VOTING CLOSED: Wednesday, 23 August 2017 @ 11:59 pm UTC
Yes 4 100
No 0 0
Abstain 0
Open Date Thursday, 17 August 2017 @ 12:00 am UTC
Close Date Wednesday, 23 August 2017 @ 11:59 pm UTC
Ballot Type Official, as defined by organization policies and procedures

Voting Statistics

Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions) 4
Eligible members who have voted 4 of 4 100%
Eligible members who have not voted 0 of 4 0%

Voting Summary by Option

Options with highest number of votes are bold
Option # Votes % of Total
Yes 4 100%
No 0 0%
Abstain 0

Voting Details

Voter Name Company Vote * Time (UTC) Comments
* Cantor, Scott Internet2 Yes 2017-08-17 14:23:00 1
* Hardjono, Thomas M.I.T. Yes 2017-08-22 12:01:00
* Lockhart, Hal Oracle Yes 2017-08-17 01:41:00
* Sultan, Madalina Connectis Yes 2017-08-17 07:21:00

Voter Comments

Submitter Vote Comment
Cantor, Scott
Internet2		 Yes I'm ok approving this because it doesn't impact the normative meaning, but I did note that the Appendices are out of order and are appearing inside the document between sections 2 and 3.