Ballot Details: Approve SAML V2.0 Attribute Predicate Profile Version 1.0 as a Committee Specification (CLOSED)

Ballot Question Do members of the Security Services (SAML) TC approve SAML V2.0 Attribute Predicate Profile Version 1.0 [1] as a Committee Specification?
Ballot Description This ballot requires a Special Majority Vote [2]. The TC roster currently lists 8 voting members. In order to pass, at least 6 members have to vote Yes and no more than 2 members may vote No.

[1] URI for the HTML version for the specification
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/43935/sstc-saml-attr-predicate-v1.0-csprd01.zip

[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process-2010-07-28.php#dSpecialMajority
Ballot Options
VOTING CLOSED: Monday, 28 November 2011 @ 11:59 pm ET
Yes 7 100
No 0 0
Abstain 0
Open Date Monday, 21 November 2011 @ 12:00 am ET
Close Date Monday, 28 November 2011 @ 11:59 pm ET

Voting Statistics

Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions) 7
Eligible members who have voted 7 of 8 87 1/2%
Eligible members who have not voted 1 of 8 12 1/2%

Voting Summary by Option

Options with highest number of votes are bold
Option # Votes % of Total
Yes 7 100%
No 0 0%
Abstain 0

Voting Details

Voter Name Company Vote * Time (GMT) Comments
* Cantor, Scott Internet2 Yes 2011-11-27 20:16:00 1
* Hardjono, Thomas M.I.T. Yes 2011-11-21 14:45:00
* Hirsch, Frederick Nokia Corporation Yes 2011-11-28 15:08:00
* Klingenstein, Nathan Internet2 Yes 2011-11-25 05:31:00
* La Joie, Chad Internet2 Yes 2011-11-26 11:56:00
* Lockhart, Hal Oracle Yes 2011-11-28 15:03:00
* Saldhana, Anil Red Hat Yes 2011-11-28 16:07:00
* Nguyenphu, Thinh Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co. KG --

Voter Comments

Submitter Vote Comment
Cantor, Scott
Internet2		 Yes I noticed a slight miswording, the text mentions that predicate statements MUST have a SAML Subject element, when it intends to say the assertion containing the statement must have one, but this is clear from the schema.