Ballot Details: Approve EML v7.0 Committee Specification Draft 01 as a Committee Specification (CLOSED)

Ballot Question Do members of the OASIS Election and Voter Services TC approve EML v7.0 Committee Specification Draft 01 [1] as a Committee Specification?
Ballot Description This ballot requires a Special Majority Vote [2]. The TC roster currently lists 8 voting members. In order to pass, at least 5 members have to vote Yes and no more than 2 members may vote No.

[1] URI for the HTML version for the specification
http://docs.oasis-open.org/election/eml/v7.0/csprd01/eml-v7.0-csprd01.html

(Complete ZIP file package: http://docs.oasis-open.org/election/eml/v7.0/csprd01/eml-v7.0-csprd01.zip)

[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process-2010-07-28.php#dSpecialMajority
Ballot Options
VOTING CLOSED: Thursday, 27 October 2011 @ 11:59 pm ET
Yes 6 100
No 0 0
Abstain 0
Open Date Thursday, 20 October 2011 @ 11:00 am ET
Close Date Thursday, 27 October 2011 @ 11:59 pm ET

Voting Statistics

Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions) 6
Eligible members who have voted 6 of 8 75%
Eligible members who have not voted 2 of 8 25%

Voting Summary by Option

Options with highest number of votes are bold
Option # Votes % of Total
Yes 6 100%
No 0 0%
Abstain 0

Voting Details

Voter Name Company Vote * Time (GMT) Comments
* Borras, John Individual Yes 2011-10-21 07:30:00
* McBurnett, Neal Individual Yes 2011-10-27 17:51:00 1
* Ross, John Individual Yes 2011-10-24 12:15:00
* Rubben, Sven IBM Yes 2011-10-21 13:12:00
* Webber, David Oracle Yes 2011-10-20 19:13:00
* Zelechoski, Peter Election Systems & Software Yes 2011-10-24 13:05:00
* Montanez, Carmelo NIST --
* Wack, John NIST --

Voter Comments

Submitter Vote Comment
McBurnett, Neal
Individual		 Yes As I wrote to the list, I think more specificity and clarity on the terms, e.g. in 510 Count, is important for EML. Hopefully we can work out one set of consistent interpretations in P1622 and in future EML revisions we can come up with something that would be a good basis for interoperable implementations.